Regional agricultural data for credit, sector and climate teams. Land use, soil, climate trend and hazard exposure joined to farm regions, with the vintage of every figure stated.
Agricultural lenders are being asked to price climate risk while the underlying public statistics decline. The Australian Bureau of Statistics ceased the Agricultural Census after 2020-21 and reduced its regional agricultural detail. The series a sector analyst would have used is now a historical record rather than a current picture.
The book still needs assessing. Credit teams are asked which regions carry drought, flood and heat exposure. Sustainability teams need portfolio-level physical risk for their own disclosure. Valuers need parcel-level context that a comparable sales file does not contain.
What can be answered
The physical layers are complete and improving. Soil properties, land use and commodity mapping, terrain, long-run rainfall and temperature observations, and downscaled climate projections all exist as open national data with stated licences. Joined to cadastre, they answer questions about the land: what it is, what it grows, what the climate has done to it, and what the projections say.
Sector analyst prompt
›
For the Riverina and Murray regions, show the trend in days over 35 degrees and rainfall deciles since 1990, projected to 2050 under two scenarios, broken down by land use class.
The table above shows the shape of the output, not a published finding. A run returns your regions, thresholds and scenarios, with the grid cells and vintages behind each figure listed underneath.
A published run
One comparison of this kind is published in full: five Riverina irrigation councils on rainfall normals, projected hot days, topsoil carbon and clay, and the irrigated, dryland and grazing split, then broken below the council average to statistical areas. Every vintage is named, and the report states what the land-use layer cannot say about water. Comparing five Riverina irrigation councils.
What cannot be answered
Production and financial performance at property level are not public. A vendor implying otherwise is modelling. Small-area commodity statistics stop at 2020-21. Regional survey series are more current but coarser. Mixing the two without stating it produces a table that looks authoritative and is not.
A credit paper that cites a 2020-21 commodity figure as current will be questioned later. Every number produced here carries its year.
Who uses it
Sector and commodity analysts building regional outlooks. Credit and climate risk teams assessing exposure across a lending book. Rural valuers who need parcel-level land, soil and climate context. Farm advisers and peak bodies producing regional briefs.
Related uses
For a lender the same engine answers the disclosure question. A portfolio of security properties screens for flood, bushfire, coastal and heat exposure like any other site list, which is the evidence base for your own climate reporting. Where a client is considering a carbon project, the soil carbon and vegetation feasibility screen runs on the same parcels.
Frequently asked
Can this assess a specific security property?
Yes, for the physical layers. Soil, terrain, land use, rainfall and temperature trend, hazard exposure, and climate projections are reported on the parcel rather than the nearest town. It cannot report what that farm produced or earned, because no public dataset carries that at property level.
How out of date is the regional production data?
The Agricultural Census stopped after 2020-21, so commodity detail at small-area level is fixed at that vintage. Survey-based regional series are later but coarser. Every figure states its year. Any current small-area commodity statistic is an estimate and should be labelled as one.
Does this cover the whole country?
Climate normals and projections, terrain, cadastre and addresses are national now. Land use and soil are NSW-first in the lake today, with the national land use and soil grids being loaded to replace them. Hazard layers cover four states.