Skip to content

Carbon project development spends money on parcels that fail at the feasibility stage. The screening questions can be answered from public data: soil type, rainfall reliability, land use history, tenure and existing entitlements. Answering them by hand takes about a week of portal work per property.

Soil carbon feasibility screening

Feasibility prompt

For these 60 properties in the Riverina, rank soil carbon project potential and flag anything with a water entitlement issue.

PropertyBaseline SOCRainfall decilePotentialFlag
Lot 12 DP 75411.1%4High—
Lot 3 DP 11282.4%6LowAlready high SOC
Lot 8 DP 33900.9%3ModerateEntitlement expiring
Datasetscadastresoil_gridsiloland_usewater_register_nsw

Low baseline soil organic carbon with reliable rainfall indicates high potential. High baseline carbon means less headroom for additionality.

Water and tenure

State water registers, entitlement records and land use mapping join to the same parcel geometry as the hazard layers. One question can cover both whether the land is physically at risk and whether the water attached to it transfers. Those are normally two separate consultants.

Pre-purchase due diligence

For rural property transactions the same joins produce a due diligence pack: hazard exposure, land use history, water entitlements, ACCU register entries against the title, and the climate trend on the parcel rather than at the nearest weather station.

Frequently asked

Does this replace a registered soil carbon feasibility study?

No. It screens whether a parcel is worth taking to a formal study, using baseline soil organic carbon, land use history, rainfall reliability and eligibility signals, before you pay for sampling.

Which carbon methods are covered?

Screening currently covers the soil carbon and environmental plantings methods. Others follow as the method determinations are encoded.

Run it on your own portfolio

Zenancy is in private preview with Group 2 reporters and their advisers.

Request access