Development site screening
Screen dozens or hundreds of sites at once against zoning, flood planning areas, TOD precincts, sales history and constraint layers, instead of running one-lot lookups by hand.
Industries
For acquisition and feasibility teams screening many sites at once — zoning, flood planning areas, TOD precincts, constraints and sales history joined to the parcel, at LGA or portfolio scale.
Acquisition teams do not lack data. They lack the ability to ask one question across all of it. Zoning is in the planning portal, flood is in a council map, sales are in a subscription tool, transit is in a timetable, and the aerial is in a fifth tab. Every one of those is available. Joining them for a single site takes ten minutes, which is fine — and joining them for four hundred sites takes a fortnight, which is why nobody does it.
The per-lot lookup market is well served. Zoned, Archistar and the incumbents do a good job of the single-site report, and they should keep doing it. The unserved question is the one before: given criteria, which parcels in this region are worth a report at all.
That is a query, and it is the kind of query the agent is for — not a fixed screen with a fixed set of filters, but whatever combination of criteria your acquisition brief actually contains this month.
Across the Central Coast LGA, list every parcel over 2,000 square metres zoned R2 or R3, outside the flood planning area, with slope under 10 degrees, that has not traded in ten years.
| Stage | Parcels remaining |
|---|---|
| Zoned R2 or R3 | 11,482 |
| Over 2,000 m² | 604 |
| Outside flood planning area | 431 |
| Slope under 10 degrees | 288 |
| No sale in ten years | 67 |
cadastreland_zoningland_constraintsproperty_salesterraing_nafThe counts above are an illustration of the shape, not a published finding about that council. The funnel matters as much as the shortlist. When a brief returns nothing, you want to see which criterion killed it, so you can go back to the investment committee with "the flood layer removed two thirds of the market" instead of "there is nothing there".
Site acquisition managers running a pipeline across several councils. Development and feasibility analysts who need market context for an LGA rather than a lot. Buyers agents screening for clients against a written brief. Town planners and valuers who need the constraint picture assembled once instead of reconstructed per job.
Cadastral parcels and G-NAF addresses form the spine. On top: NSW land zoning, flood planning areas and land constraint layers, transport-oriented development precincts, transit stops, the road network, aircraft noise contours, Valuer General sales history, terrain from the national elevation model, and the full hazard stack — bushfire prone land, flood extents, coastal change and heat.
Development application activity from the NSW online DA service and ABS building approvals by LGA are being connected now. Victorian and Queensland zoning follow; the addresses, transit, terrain and hazard layers they attach to are already national or multi-state, with cadastre and roads NSW today.
A portfolio due diligence pack is the same machinery pointed at sites you already hold rather than sites you want. Hazard exposure per asset, constraint overlays, sales comparables, and the physical climate risk assessment that a lender or an AASB S2 reporting parent will ask for. One join, two deliverables.
Keep it. Per-site tools answer questions about a site you have already found. This answers which sites to look at, across an LGA or a whole acquisition pipeline, using criteria you define. The two are complementary and most teams that screen at scale end up needing both.
Valuer General sales are refreshed on the publisher's cycle, and every output records the vintage of the extract it used. Where a parcel has no recorded sale, that is reported as no record rather than as a gap you might read as recent.
Yes. Lot and plan resolves directly against cadastre; street addresses go through G-NAF first. Mixed input in one file is fine, and anything that fails to resolve comes back as a list to fix rather than being quietly dropped.
Screen dozens or hundreds of sites at once against zoning, flood planning areas, TOD precincts, sales history and constraint layers, instead of running one-lot lookups by hand.
Asset-level physical climate risk screening across flood, bushfire, coastal recession and extreme heat, using Australian open hazard data and CMIP6 scenarios.
Australia's authoritative address file, used as the entry point to the land spine. Coverage, update cadence, licence and the queries the agent runs against it.
Zenancy is in private preview with Group 2 reporters and their advisers.
Request access